Speculation about the pending update to online authentication guidance has been circulating around water coolers for months now. "A [disclosure] like this could make it more challenging for the regulators," says attorney David Navetta.
"It's interesting to see regulators putting the onus on the financial companies for fraud that occurs after the theft has already happened," says David Navetta, co-chairman of the American Bar Association's Information Security Committee.
"We want to know what the FFIEC guidelines actually mean and who is responsible for enforcing audits and compliance," says fraud victim Jim Payne, owner of Choice Escrow.
A preliminary draft of new online authentication guidance from the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council puts greater responsibility on the shoulders of financial institutions to enhance security.
After one of its commercial customers fell victim to an online account takeover, this community bank suffered losses, reputational damage and learned that legal disputes rarely favor the bank.
"I'm not sure there is a way to protect a customer if their actions put their network at risk," says the president of a bank victimized by corporate account takeover.
From payment cards to checks, ACH transactions to phishing, there's no question that fraudsters have waged war on banks. And now the institutions are fighting back.
NACHA's CEO says ACH-related fraud is often over-hyped, and occurs far less often than check- and payment card-related fraud. But when corporate accounts are breached, fraudulent ACH transactions lead to big financial losses.
The Experi-Metal Inc. vs. Comerica Bank case is just one of several high-profile incidents of corporate account takeover -- but it's the first to finally head to court.
Our website uses cookies. Cookies enable us to provide the best experience possible and help us understand how visitors use our website. By browsing ffiec.bankinfosecurity.com, you agree to our use of cookies.
